Racial and Cultural Conflict in A Passage to India
"Why can't we be friends now?" said the
other, holding him affectionately. … But {the horses…the earth…the temples, the
tank, the jail, the palace, the birds, the carrion, the Guest House… didn't
want it,} they said in their hundred voices, "No, not yet," and the
sky said, "No, not there."
This
extract is from the ending part of A
Passage to India where meet two of the representatives of the British and
the Indians who were friends early in the novel. The British one wants to
reconcile but the whole situation opposes it. Thus it clarifies how evident the
racial conflict was.
E.M. Forster's A Passage to India was written
at a time when the end of the British colonial presence in India was
becoming a very real possibility. And as a result, racial conflict between the
British and the Indians was a recurrent happening in India.
As part of the ideology of colonialism, throughout the
novel, the English demonstrate their belief that they are superior to the
Indians.
"Forster
draws an unforgettable picture of the tensions between colonial rulers and the
Indian professional class (Critical Survey of Long Fiction.1141)."
The
comments and treatment that the Indians receive from the English characters in
the novel show the common attitude toward the Indians during this time.
In order to legitimize their
colonizing India, not
legally obtained, the British colonizers set up a “degenerated” image of native
people partly through imagination or misunderstandingThe new coming British
people in India
are injected such notion by the early comers. Mrs. Turton tries to convince
Mrs. Moore:
Don't forget that. You're superior to everyone in India except
one or two of the Ranis, and they're on an equality.
Most of the English
characters, especially females, always keep a neglecting distance from the
Indians. For example, an English lady doesn’t reply to Dr. Aziz’s
"You are most
welcome, ladies."
rather takes his carriage
without asking him. Even,
"Indians are not
allowed into the Chandrapore Club even as guests,"
On the contrary, the Indians
have a differing attitude towards the English. Actually they want their
association but the British don’t. The action of the novel begins with the
Indians’ discussion on
“as to whether or no it is possible to be friends with
an Englishman.”(chaper 2).
But, the novel ends with the
conclusion that it is not possible until the British leave India, as
quoted in the beginning of our discussion.
The novel’s main action begins after two English women’s
coming to visit India.
They intend to know India
through close observation. The Turtons arrange a “Bridge Party” in their honour in order “to bridge the gulf between East and West.” But the irony is that the
bridge attempt leads to misunderstanding and racial conflicts.
Actually cultural misunderstanding is an important reason behind the racial
conflict. Differing cultural ideas and expectations regarding hospitality,
social properties and the role of religion in daily life are responsible for
misunderstandings between the English and the Muslim Indians, the English and
the Hindu Indians, and between the Muslims and the Hindus.
The racial conflict
reaches its climax in A Passage to India when Adela Quested accuses Dr.
Aziz in court of attempting to seduce/rape her in Marabar Caves.
It seems that Chandrapur is
preparing for a war: it is divided into two groups. However, Fielding joins the
Indians, for he believes and knows that the accusation is false.
Even their hostile
attitude to each other becomes evident in the trial/court room. McBryde while
presenting Aziz’s crime, makes a strict racial comment generalizing the common
tendency of the Indians as “Oriental Pathology”,
“the darker races are physically attracted by the
fairer, but not _vice versa_ this, not a matter for abuse, but just a fact
which any scientific observer will confirm.
{However, this racial
attack was not without a counter attack: Adela’s physical structure is
satirized by onme of the Indians
"Even when the lady is so uglier than the
gentleman?"}
Actually,
we find McBryde’s predecessor in William Shakespeare’s The Tempest where
Prospero, a racist, treats Caliban in the same way accusing him of ravishing
Miranda:
“…thou didst seek to violate
The honour of my child.”
The honour of my child.”
Longman Dictionary of Modern Literature sees Dr. Aziz episode as “a tragedy of racial tensions and
antagonism” in the following quote:
The novel is essentially a tragedy of
racial tensions and antagonism, in which the case of Dr. Aziz is a symbolic
episode’ (Longman,
2000:410).
In the novel, the British characters repeatedly
mention the influence of the landscape and climate in forming the national
characteristics. In this respect also they seem to be superior. The reviewer of Harcourt Brace published
Forster’s A Passage to India(1984) summarizes their Orientalist idea,
First, the idea that the climate forms the national
characteristics. In the case of India, the characteristics is the
colorless heat, that drives British crazy, and that make Indians
"born" as the irrational. Second, the idea that the land
represents its people, and vice versa.
{That is by birth, Oriental
Indians are stereotypically considered to be exotic, sensual, passive, and
backward, as opposed to the intellectual, civilized, progressive Westerners who
have come to civilize and rule the Indians. }
To draw a conclusion
of our discussion, racial conflict is one of dominant themes of A Passage to
India. The
final message of the novel is that though Aziz and Fielding want to be friends,
historical circumstances prevent their friendship. Paul Armstrong suggests that A Passage to India reflects Forster’s
“recognition
of the impossibility of reconciling different ways of seeing”(365).
His
argument is fairly accurate, for Forster leaves us a very uncertain ending. In
colonial India, cultural difference indicates a kind of superiority or
inferiority, the centre and the periphery, {the dominating and the dominated,
order and disorder, the authentic and the inauthentic, the powerful and the
powerless}m who cannot be reconciled. But in post-colonial world, this colonial
mentality has been rooted out, and the central position of the West destructed
by writers like Kiran Desai who with her novel The Inheritance of Loss(2006), challenges the dominance of the West
and the “reality” of an orderly, civilized “center” told by the West.
Works Cited
Armstrong,
Paul B. “Reading India: E. M. Forster and the
Politics of Interpretation”. Twentieth
Century Literature, Vol. 38, No. 4, Winter, 1992, pp. 365-385
Forster,
E. M. A Passage to India. San Diego &
NY: Harcourt Brace, 1984.
Longman
Dictionary of Modern Literature. London:
Longman, 2000
Desai,
Kiran. The Inheritance of Loss. New
York: Grove Press, 2006.
Is it easy to understand a Racial and Cultural Conflict in A Passage to India
ReplyDelete