A Doll’s House: Development of Nora’s Character
He [papa] called me his doll-child, …I was simply
transferred from papa's hands into yours. […] You and papa have committed a
great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life.
This is a revolting statement of Nora, the
protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. Though at first she
appears as an ordinary housewife, through her bitter experience in the
patriarchal society, finally she turns into a revolting modern woman. Thus, Shuei-may
Chang(2004: 18-19) comments,
“The
character Nora became a representative of the new woman or the modern woman….
Nora’s action of leaving home became a literary motif in writing.”
At the beginning of A
Doll’s House, Nora seems like a bit of a ditz and completely happy with her family affairs. She does not to
mind her doll-like existence, in which she is coddled, pampered, and
patronized; in which her husband, Torvald, address her,
Is that my little lark
twittering out there?
and
Is
it my little squirrel bustling about?
and, worst of all, a "featherhead". Even we the audiences
are somehow inclined to agree with her position.
But in the course of the
play, Nora reveals that she is not just a “silly girl,” as Torvald calls
her. Her taking out a loan in her own accord to preserve Torvald’s health, her secret
labor undertaken to pay off her debt, her willingness to break the law in order
to ensure Torvald’s health shows her intention, determination and courage. Even “it was a tremendous pleasure” to her to work and earn money for
her husband. She feels like modern women equal to men,
“It was like being a man.”
Though Nora does more than
what is expected according to the gender roles attributed by the cultural
practices to the males and the females, she is not matured enough to understand
the ways of the real world. She lives in a dream world, a child fantasy, where
everything is perfect. She reacts passionately to Krogstad’s idea of punishment
of her signing of her father’s signature.
"This
I refuse to believe. A daughter hasn't a right to protect her dying father from
anxiety and care? A wife hasn't a right to save her husband's life?”
However, Nora gets the necessary
wisdom and support to grow up from Kristine, her childhood friend who has been
in the real world, unlike other housewives. With Kristine, Nora can share her
everything. She confides her secret to her:
“What
if Torvald heard? He mustn't, for anything in the world. Nobody must know
Kristine, no one but you".
Their open friendship makes her feel
liberated, open minded, and comfortable to be honest to express herself freely
to Torvalt.
Nora,
like most of the women in the patriarchal societies, feels contented to be
supported and protected in difficult situation of life by her husband. To enhance
her husband’s love for her in later years of life she keeps it secret that
“It was I who
saved Torvald's life”
She says to Kristine
“…after many years, when I am no longer as
nice-looking as I am now. […] then it may be a good thing to have something in
reserve—“
Furthermore, she feels proud of her
husband’s assurance,
“Nora, I have often wished that you might be
threatened by some great danger, so that I might risk my life's blood, and
everything, for your sake.”
But
when the secret comes out, and when Torvald
reveals himself a different man falsifying her desire, she gets shocked:
“I was so absolutely certain, you would come forward and take everything
upon yourself, and say: I am the guilty one.”
Rather, he
stoops to Krogstad’s “conditions” and calls her, “a hypocrite,
a liar--worse, worse--a criminal”, Nora
becomes frustrated because her long cherished ‘miracle’ or “wonderful” thing doesn’t happen. This observation of Nora is the final
catalyst for Nora’s awakening into a new person.
Having observed that the
male dominated society considers that the roles of man and woman are different,
the transformed Nora realizes through epiphany that
“I believe that before all
else I am a reasonable human being.”
not only “a wife and a mother”.
A man in that
society can do many things for his beloved, but, as Torvald says,
“no man would sacrifice his
honour for the one he loves”
On the
contrary, Kristine sacrifices her love
for the sake of her family; Nora also sacrifices her everything for her husband
and in general
“It is a thing hundreds of
thousands of women have done.”
Realizing such
things, Nora walks out, leaving everything … behind, “to understand” herself and everything about her properly, “to educate” herself, and to be a true
human being and,
“to see if I can make out
who is right, the world or I”
Hence, Theresa
Hyun(2004:57) comments on Nora,
“A
Doll’s House portrayed the anguish of a woman who sought to be liberated from
the traditional family system so that she could live a more fully human life.”
Though, the playwright,
Henrik Ibsen, denied that he had intentionally written a feminist play,
preferring to think of it as humanist, still Nora has often been painted as one
of modern drama's first feminist heroines. Over the course of the play, she becomes,
like a feminist, suspicious of the role of tradition, religion, morality in the
patriarchal society, and breaks away from all sorts of domination.
I do not exactly know what
religion is.
The thing [moral sense]
perplexes me altogether.
To
conclude our discussion, the character of Nora is a courageous depiction of
Ibsen. Early on in the text, the home is seen as a thing of joy, a place of
comfort and shelter, a place of a happy family. But, towards the play's
conclusion, Nora realizes that home is revealed as a doll's house, a prison
where she has no self-identity. Therefore, Nora has transgresses the
traditional stereotype of womanhood. She has been such an influential modern
character that, Theresa Hyun(2004:148) comments,
“Nora [is] adopted as a symbol of
women’s struggles in many countries.”
Works Cited:
Chang, Shuei-may Casting off the shackles of family: Ibsen's Nora
figure in modern Chinese literature. Peter Lang, 2004
Hyun, Theresa. Writing women in Korea: translation and feminism in
the colonial period. University of Hawaii Press, 2004
Comments
Post a Comment